The Sacred Cows Of Yellowstone
Posted by skyblu on June 4, 2007
THOU SHALT NOT SPEAK EVIL OF THESE
I have a bit of pity & some sympathy for the poor journalists in this part of the country. I just plain pity the journalists in the rest of the country.
When it comes to reporting about Yellowstone National Park they have a long list of topics that they cannot report about. They have, after all, advertising and public sentiment to deal with. The scribes, either through fear or ignorance refuse to address the problems caused by the Sacred Cows of Yellowstone.
Reporting about Yellowstone is also fraught with pitfalls propagated by the NPS. The NPS has fostered a picture of perfection to be projected about the park – after all, it’s their job as chief cheerleader. But a few honest remarks about the problems in Yellowstone would go a long way toward correcting them. Horror of horrors – tell the truth.
Currently it’s the Sacred Bison that these sages of the press are skating around. They have not addressed the bison policy, overpopulation, or the destruction that the bison do to the Yellowstone prairies or the environment in general.
Worry not about the poor little babies. Worry about Yellowstone National Park. Reduce the herd to a size that is in keeping with honest preservation of the environment and the ecology of Yellowstone.
However, you can bet that many local reporters will continue to use unprofessional inflammatory language when protecting this sacred cow – it generates readership and advertising. After all, Shakespeare played to the crowd, [For some sane and non-inflammatory reporting read Glenn Hockett.]
The SACRED ELK is another scourge of the Yellowstone incubation mentality. They are raised on invasive grasses in Mammoth. They are so habituated that they lounge on the lawns and the old parade grounds. The park administration does not ticket visitors, (see Sacred Rules and Sacred Rangers below,) nor do they consider the plight of these critters that are rapidly losing their wild nature. (See 2004 video of elk charging and goring visitor.)
Another is the SACRED DIESEL TOUR BUS; a conveyance that does nothing to enhance the visitor experience that the NPS is always talking about. It slows traffic, crowds roads, blocks vistas, and spews carcinogens and other pollution into the atmosphere of the park. It is far worse for Yellowstone and its visitors than a few snowmobiles. This sacred cow should never be attacked because it generates enormous amounts of revenue and concurrently herds humans into manageable groups.
Too, the SACRED MOTOR HOME; with four wealthy humans taking up the space that 40 less affluent humans use in the tour bus. These $200,000 – or much more behemoths, are usually pulling a $50,000 Hummer [or some such.] This travesty of the roadway has double immunity because it is also the preferred mode of transportation for the seasonal help that Xanterra & Delaware North hire. These monsters are also allowed preferred parking in the park campgrounds, denying visitors space. Mention it not!
Then, the SACRED EMPLOYEE PUB, is verboten. This is akin to the military providing slot machines to the troops and fostering gambling addictions. Could this be happening with alcohol in Yellowstone? Heaven forbid. Don’t let the public know about this.
And mention not the SACRED GEYSER GAZERS that are allowed special access to off-trail areas and thermal features. Sign up and you too can leave your footprints and ball caps in the mud.
Don’t dare to explore the activities of the SACRED SKIERS. These bota-totin’, off-trail-shoutin’, skinny-dipping denizens that supposedly are much nicer to the park than the average winter visitor are the darlings of journalists and bloggers alike. Gimme a break.
The SACRED BICYCLISTS are also saints and never go off trail or stress the fauna by getting too close. Both of these groups of saints are protected by the Sacred Rules and Sacred Rangers, (see below.) Fear the wrath of ‘greenies’ if you tell the truth about either of these two cows.
By no means investigate the SACRED RULES that allow visitors to move closer to bison and elk than to bears; despite the fact that more visitors [in their stupidity] are harmed by bison and elk than bears. And certainly don’t mention the SACRED RANGERS that refuse, (by order,) to issue tickets for these infractions against the bison and the elk. This is law enforcement tempered by the almighty tourist dollar.
The SACRED BOMBARDIER is a genuine offense to reason, environmental sanity, fiscal responsibility, and public safety. Don’t honestly report on these cows of the winter landscape – you’ll incur the wrath of moneyed visitor interests and motorized recreationists across the country.
The most egregious sin of the Yellowstone Hacks is their failure to recognize the travesty of the SACRED FLY FISHERMAN. These ’sportsmen’ are backed by both park personnel and the giant fly fishing industry. The park has rules to enable the destruction of streams in order to placate this cow. The ‘incubator mentality’ is best viewed in the realm of fishing and the stocking history of the NPS. It’s time to fix this!
Without the SACRED FLY FISHERMAN, and his commercial lobby, the New Zealand Mud Snail would not be in Yellowstone. Without the SACRED FLY FISHERMAN the previously pristine Firehole River would be allowed to produce its native mayflies, stone flies, midges, and caddis flies in a natural fashion; without the depredation of non-native species. But these creatures have no cheerleaders, (nor does Yellowstone’s ecology.) So, the fly fisherman is allowed to keep his invasive trout, introduced from afar. Enhance the visitor experience at the expense of the native species.
The Yellowstone fishing regulations encourage; nay, facilitate destruction of park resources by mandating “torture and release” of invasive species. This is blatant disregard for the intent of preservation of the park resources. But, without the SACRED FLY FISHERMAN many dollars would be lost by the preservation and restoration of a once beautiful stream. Hacks don’t dare address this – they fish. And so does Brad Pitt – bring on the rationalizations for avoiding this topic.
There are many others of course. But there is far too little jaundice in the eyes of the regional hacks. They too have bought into the Picture-Perfect-Yellowstone myth. Conventional wisdom always wins – no matter how wrong – just look at the political and environmental mess our parks are in.
Other Sacred Cows that are running rampant in Yellowstone include: the SACRED TOUR GUIDE, the SACRED PARKING VIOLATOR, the SACRED SEASONAL RANGER, the SACRED WOMAN SUPERINTENDENT, the SACRED BUILDING CLUTTER, the SACRED SLUMS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, the SACRED BUILDING BOOM AND THE ATTENDANT WASTE DISPOSAL PROBLEMS INCLUDING SEWAGE, and many, many, more.
Just what has happened to investigative journalism in our National Parks? Or do the American Public not want to know? This is worse than Fantasy Land.



tcwriter said
It seems the problem isn’t that the bison have too many cheerleaders, it’s that the cattle have far more.
Since you’re in favor of a pristine environment for the Firehole (however that would be accomplished), why not advocate the same for the park and it surroundings?
A year-round season on cattle would fly; in no time at all, we’d have plenty of grass for bison, and the threat of brucellis transmission to livestock will be no more.
Frankly, I like it. I wonder why no scribe has proposed it yet? Could it be the biggest sacred cow of all stands in the way?
skyblu said
Tcwriter,
The truth is what you speak.
The first of the depredations of the park took place by the railroad-subsidized concessionaires that not only shot the bison and elk, but overgrazed the Lamar and Parts of the islands in the lake with herds of cattle.
The re-introduction of the bison added to this problem as the buffalo-boys of the ‘Buffalo Ranch’ herded and husbanded the initial herd. They needed to keep the bison together to allow them to bring them in for the winter and feed them. This turned the bison into meadow maggots as they grazed in compact herds.
An interesting byproduct of this initial practice was the removal of recalcitrant genes from the ’seed herd.’ Bison that would not herd-up and go docilely to corral were shot and eaten. The contemporary sin against bison – as bison – is the hazing of that small part of the herd that still has the wanderlust – death to wild genes, [just as in cattle.]
Artimesia Tridentata invaded to replace the grasses and it’s been downhill ever since. The removal of predators allowed the ungulates to proliferate and the rest is [as they say,] history.
Brucellosis is a red herring. There are many ways to deal with it. And deal with it we shall, as soon as a second herd of cattle is infected. It’s not the bison, it’s the elk. If bison were hunted to the extent that elk are a resolution would come sooner.
The National Park charter and it’s various enabling legislations, including the Organic Act call for preservation and restoration first, then enjoyment by the people. The area around Yellowstone has no such mandate – although the first “forest reserve” was established surrounding Yellowstone as a buffer zone. This morphed into a National Forest and gave birth to the USFS.
Pristine is tough, but restoration is possible. However, as long as fishermen ignore the “kill Rainbows” guidelines on Slough Creek; and as long as fishing is so lucrative for the special interests that thrive on any fish, there will never be an honest response to the Organic Act, or even the upcoming Centennial Initiative. Fishermen are far more interested in fishing than the fish or the streams.
Yellowstone deserves to be viewed as an ecological example rather than a hodge-podge of practices from the past. As long as the perception that fishing is an entitlement of fishermen, and as long as viewing wildlife is viewed as an entitlement of visitors, and as long as the park is sundered by competing selfish interests – it will be folly to pretend that bison are any more important than Charolais, Angus, Herefords, or any other cow.
Thanks for the comment; and, there is a year-round season on cattle, that’s where beef comes from.
…….skyblu
Owen Hoffman said
What about volunteers in the parks, are they not also sacred? Do they not also come to the park in large RV’s, or does the NPS provide housing?
For those who volunteer for longer periods of time, but have neither park housing nor access to a huge RV, where do they get to shower?
skyblu said
Owen,
High status, returning VIP’s frequently get housing. Some is dorm-style, some is family style with the family included. They get preferred parking, if they have RV. If the volunteer has no dwelling they have no shower.
…..skyblu
Tom Wylie said
Lordy, Skye
I’m a critic too (What about the “sacred snowmobile?”), but when everything is a sacred cow, the phrase sort of looses its effectiveness and becomes meaningless.
Enjoy life a little more. It is not a dress rehearsal.
As for investigative journalism, it’s practically extinct in this country, so don’t expect to see it anywhere very often, certainly not in Yellowstone any time soon!
be said
the sacred cow takes the cake all over this country. vast expanses of public lands, subsidies, and government incursions on any value other than the financial exploits of this beast are granted this dwindling “lifestyle”.
The Exterminators
skyblu said
The sacred cow/cow and the sacred snowmobile are very much ‘eyeballed’ by most news sources. Both can cause inordinate damage and it’s visible for the public to see and read about.
.
There is much about Yellowstone that deserves commendation and goes unrecognized. But, if no jaundice is in the eyes of the press, it will certainly not be in the mind of the public.
.
The concept that Yellowstone is “wild” and at the same time a postcard of eden with motor homes seems not to bother the visitor. It’s what they want, and it’s fostered by an unhealthy praise of the un-praiseworthy.
…..skyblu