It’s NOT the economy, stupid!

NEW SITUATIONS – OLD COMPLAINTS

1916-cody-road.jpgIt’s time to finally acknowledge that the National Park Service charter does not guarantee the economic health of entrepreneurs. No national park owes anyone a living – including administrators and rangers.

A note in the Casper Star Tribune, “Shut Out Of Yellowstone” bemoans the potential detrimental economic impact of the possible closing of the east entrance to Yellowstone during winter.

Decisions about the operation of the national parks should be enterprise neutral. But the last eight years has seen more response to “business” concerns than we’ve seen since the Northern Pacific jammed Yellowstone down the congressional throat in the late 19th century.

Ever since William Cody teamed up with the railroads the town has used Yellowstone as a draw – and that’s O.K. However, one business in Cody, Wyoming plans to sue Yellowstone National Park because their business has been hurt by the east entrance policies.

In the meantime, though, one local business owner is preparing to take his concerns to court. Jon Sowerwine, owner of High Country Adventures, the only snowcoach operator from the east gate, says this winter’s business has been exceptionally slow due to the continual discussion of avalanche dangers and the concern for public safety on Sylvan Pass. He plans to file a lawsuit in the next couple of weeks against the Park Service based on decisions officials have made this year.

“Their actions are deliberately against us,” he said. “This has definitely been our worst year.”

mud-slide-sylvan-rescue-nps-jim-pasco.jpgSylvan pass is prone to mudslides and avalanches. The discussions about it being open should be limited to that. Period. End of story. (NPS photos by Al Nash and Jim Pasco.)heavy-eqpt-sylvan-pass-nps-al-nash.jpg

The merchants of Cody, West Yellowstone, Jackson, and Gardiner have long taken advantage of their geographical location to profit from the proximity of Yellowstone National Park – that’s fine. However, Yellowstone owes no one a living.

sylvan-snowblower-nps-al-nash.jpgThe economic well being of ranchers has nothing to do with wolf reintroduction. The economic well being of snowmobile tours has nothing to do with winter access. The economic well being of snow coach operators has nothing to do with winter access. It’s time for the National Park Service to acknowledge this and move on.

Perhaps, if park administrators can make the leap from economic entitlement to environmental entitlement, a sane operating policy for Yellowstone can emerge.

As it now stands, John Sacklin and Suzanne Lewis are busy trying to keep Xanterra, Delaware North, and all the gateway community businesses profitable. This is a poor way to run a park.

====================

decal-cody-road.jpgBurlington Northern brochure & decal from the ‘Robert Goss Collection.’ See “Making Concessions in Yellowstone.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • RSS National Parks Traveler

  • RSS VINOGRAPHY

  • RSS Wine Hiker

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS MID CURRENT

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS NOAA HEADLINES

    • Storm system to bring heavy rainfall and the potential for flash flooding over the southern Mid Atlantic and Southeast U.S.
  • RSS FLYFISHMAGAZINE

  • RSS Fly Fishing Colorado

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Trout Nut

  • Feeds For You

    Subscribe with Bloglines





    Fair Use Notice

    --- This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

    --- We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

    --- If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
  • %d bloggers like this: